linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.37 considered stable?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:10:48 +0100
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@...bisoft.de>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.37 considered stable?

On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 04:51 -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
>  just curious and no criticism intended :-) Is 2.6.37 so stable, that it doesn't 
> need fixes? I mean, it is almost a month out in the wild and no stable release.

We're lulling bugs into a false sense of security.  We'll slaughter them
by the hundreds in their sleep :)

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/