linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.38-rc3 regression on parisc: segfaults

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:17:06 -0500 (EST)
From:	"John David Anglin" <dave@...uly1.hia.nrc.ca>
To:	carlos@...temhalted.org (Carlos O'Donell)
Cc:	dave.anglin@...-cnrc.gc.ca, mroos@...ux.ee,
	linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.38-rc3 regression on parisc: segfaults

> > This is possibly the infamous COW bug.
> 
> The COW bug that is triggered by a COW from an LWS-CAS? The solution
> to which is to use locks around the LWS-CAS even on UP? I'd forgotten
> about this issue actually, I should push that patch out to James.

I was actually thinking of the fork/clone race for which there are various
testcases on the wiki.  The aptitude segv is with a SMP kernel, so I don't
think this is the UP LWS_CAS issue.  However, I agree you should push
the change.

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin                                  dave.anglin@...-cnrc.gc.ca
National Research Council of Canada              (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/