linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the msm tree with the arm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:17:34 -0800
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>
To:	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stepan Moskovchenko <stepanm@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the msm tree with the arm tree

On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 16:47 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> The actual problem here is that some people, notably the msm folks,
> are 
> bypassing the maintainer hierarchy and going straight to Linus for
> their 
> pull requests instead of asking RMK to pull.  We once debated this at 

I don't think it's fair to single out MSM here. Going straight to Linus
was discussed at one point, as I recall, and Russell didn't oppose it at
the time. There are a number of ARM sub-architecture maintainers that do
this.. None of that is related to the rejects created here, those would
happen no matter who we submitted pull requests to.

I think the issue is more that MSM is actively being cleanup , and
Russell is touching code that we're working on also. So we need a way to
work together .. In this case the collision is so simple that either
Linus or Russell would just fix it up while pulling, and both would
likely be fine with that. In the past I've tried to fix up these issues,
but now I think maybe it's doesn't matter.

In terms of Russell rebasing, I don't really like that. I've based MSM
trees on Russell's stable branch and it's worked in the past. If
Russell's rebasing then we can't really do that, so one tool to fix
these problems is gone.

Daniel

-- 
Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/