linux-kernel - Re: Early crash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Feb 2011 11:28:30 -0800
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...are.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	"schwab@...ux-m68k.org" <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>,
	"geert@...ux-m68k.org" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	"rusty@...tcorp.com.au" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org" <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Early crash

On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 11:27:08AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...are.com>
> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:58:29 -0800
> 
> > But, theoretically speaking, nothing stops GCC to align pointers with
> > "gaps" as well? Let's say having everything (or some) aligned on
> > quadword boundary even though arch is 32 bit?
> 
> The alignment business only applies to aggregates (ie. structs and
> unions).
> 
> This has been confirmed via several weeks of expermentation with
> different GCC versions on different platforms as well.

I see. OK, then I'll prepare a patch to switch over to struct + pointer
scheme.


Thanks,

Dmitry

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/