| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:43:57 +0200 From: Tomas Winkler <tomasw@...il.com> To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> Cc: Oren Weil <oren.jer.weil@...el.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, david@...dhou.se, david.woodhouse@...el.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/13] Intel(R) MEI Driver On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 01:54:54AM -0800, Oren Weil wrote: >> Intel(R) Management Engine Interface (Intel(R) MEI) Driver >> ========================================================== >> >> This patch contains a new Intel driver for the Linux kernel: The Intel(R) MEI Driver. > > This patch? What patch, there is no patch here. > > You sent out 13 emails with the same exact Subject line, which is not > acceptable at all, and mighty confusing. > >> This set of patches is for review purposes; the driver code >> for pull is in the David Woodhouse public git repository: >> http://git.infradead.org/linux-2.6-mei.git > > No, we need these as patches, not as a pull request. Please work on > fixing up your individual patches, that's the only way this is going to > be accepted. There was a suggestion of splitting the driver into per file patches to be reviewable rather then creating gigantic driver patch. I personally would prefer the later one would happy to here any other suggestions how to split driver. Thanks Tomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists