linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH][RFC] infiniband: Fix allocation size in register_snoop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:19:29 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To:	"Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>
cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
	Eli Cohen <eli@...lanox.co.il>, Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
	Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH][RFC] infiniband: Fix allocation size in
 register_snoop_agent()

On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Hefty, Sean wrote:

> > Ok, someone needs to double check me on this before merging anything, but
> > don't we want to allocate sizeof(struct ib_mad_snoop_private) here, rather
> > than just the size of a pointer to the struct?
> 
> new_snoop_table is declared as:
> 
> struct ib_mad_snoop_private **new_snoop_table;
> 
> It should point to an array of pointers.
> 
Ok. Thank you for that reply.
Just ignore the patch then.

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>            http://www.chaosbits.net/
Plain text mails only, please.
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/