linux-kernel - Re: Questions about Linux workqueue in 2.6.36

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:03:00 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Questions about Linux workqueue in 2.6.36

Hello,

On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 02:38:36PM -0800, Ray Jui wrote:
> You are right. The problem with the rescuer is that when it is
> leaving a gcwq, it does not check to see whether it needs to wake up
> a worker to process subsequent work items. After applying your
> patch, I see pid 26 getting waken up by the rescuer and work items
> from mmc1 and mmc2 are now being processed properly.

Cool, I'll send the patch to upstream and stable.

> I also did a quick profiling on the amount of time it takes to
> create a new worker on our system. It takes 15 ~ 20 ms. This is not
> surprising as it's an embedded system and it was during kernel boot
> up and the system was getting quite busy. Regardless, the current 10
> ms initial mayday timeout has resolution issues on a lot of embedded
> systems with worse timer resolutions (e.g., 10 ms on our system).

Can you please verify the second patch removes the unncessary rescuer
invocation?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/