lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 17:52:44 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> CC: x32-abi@...glegroups.com, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, GCC Development <gcc@....gnu.org>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com> Subject: Re: X32 psABI status On 02/13/2011 01:33 PM, Alan Cox wrote: > > Who actually needs this new extra API - whats the justification for > everyone having more crud dumping their kernels, more syscall paths > (which are one of the most security critical areas) and the like. > > What are the benchmark numbers to justify this versus just using the > existing kernel interfaces ? > That's what the prototype is meant to show. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists