linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH UPDATED 03/26] x86, NUMA: Drop @start/last_pfn from initmem_init() initmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:58:02 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, yinghai@...nel.org,
	brgerst@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com, shaohui.zheng@...el.com,
	rientjes@...gle.com, hpa@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 03/26] x86, NUMA: Drop @start/last_pfn from
 initmem_init() initmem_init()

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 03:20:11PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> You forgot to add:
> 
>   Reported-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> 
> The kernel development process is review and testing limited and we have a clear 
> oversupply in development power. So we want to encourage review and testing feedback 
> as much as possible, so adding all the Reported-by / Tested-by tags is absolutely 
> vital to being able to do more development.

git tree updated accordingly, but Reported-by?  I use that to identify
the person who found out the root problem the commit is addressing.
Once review cycle is complete, Reviewed/Acked-by's will be added so
I'm not sure adding Reported-by serves any purpose.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/