linux-kernel - Re: [stable] [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.38-rc3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:50:02 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@...il.com>
Cc:	xfs@....sgi.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, stable@...nel.org,
	Alex Elder <aelder@....com>
Subject: Re: [stable] [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.38-rc3

On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 11:02:31PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Thursday 03 of February 2011, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 11:00:33AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> > > On 11-01-31 11:42 AM, Alex Elder wrote:
> > > > Linus, please accept the following updates for XFS, for 2.6.38-rc3
> > > > (if it's not too late) or 2.6.38-rc4.
> > > > 
> > > > They are all fixes for bugs that have some pretty undesirable
> > > > consequences. 
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > Are these bugs all new in 2.6.38, or should some of these fixes
> > > also go out to -stable for earlier revisions?
> > > >       xfs: fix dquot shaker deadlock
> > 
> > That's a regression, so maybe.
> 
> Definitely, xfs_fsr can hit this even few times a day (happened already).
> 
> Stable team, please include this one for 2.6.37.1:

Now queued up (it will make .2, sorry, not .1)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/