linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:48:52 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, brgerst@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com,
	shaohui.zheng@...el.com, rientjes@...gle.com, hpa@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration


> > If you want the whole series reposted, please let me know.

Actually, it would be nice if you could merge your tree to the latest x86/mm tree i 
have just pushed out :-/

The problem is that your work is so wide that it conflicts with x86/mm, x86/bootmem, 
x86/amd-nb and x86/mm:

arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h
arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h
arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c

I consolidated all these topics into the generic x86/mm tree which you could use as 
a base.

I did not recognize the level of conflicts until i tried to pull your tree. You can 
generally test such interactions with other bits of the x86 tree by test-merging 
your pending work to tip:master.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/