linux-kernel - [PATCH 17/33] x86-64, NUMA: Remove %NULL @nodeids handling from compute_hash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:20:51 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, yinghai@...nel.org,
	brgerst@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com, shaohui.zheng@...el.com,
	rientjes@...gle.com, mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...ux.intel.com,
	ankita@...ibm.com
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 17/33] x86-64, NUMA: Remove %NULL @nodeids handling from compute_hash_shift()

numa_emulation() called compute_hash_shift() with %NULL @nodeids which
meant identity mapping between index and nodeid.  Make
numa_emulation() build identity array and drop %NULL @nodeids handling
from populate_memnodemap() and thus from compute_hash_shift().  This
is to prepare for transition to using memblks instead.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@...el.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c |   14 +++++++-------
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index e211c00..243d18d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -63,12 +63,7 @@ static int __init populate_memnodemap(const struct bootnode *nodes,
 		do {
 			if (memnodemap[addr >> shift] != NUMA_NO_NODE)
 				return -1;
-
-			if (!nodeids)
-				memnodemap[addr >> shift] = i;
-			else
-				memnodemap[addr >> shift] = nodeids[i];
-
+			memnodemap[addr >> shift] = nodeids[i];
 			addr += (1UL << shift);
 		} while (addr < end);
 		res = 1;
@@ -706,6 +701,7 @@ static int __init split_nodes_size_interleave(u64 addr, u64 max_addr, u64 size)
 static int __init numa_emulation(unsigned long start_pfn,
 			unsigned long last_pfn, int acpi, int amd)
 {
+	static int nodeid[NR_NODE_MEMBLKS] __initdata;
 	u64 addr = start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
 	u64 max_addr = last_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
 	int num_nodes;
@@ -730,7 +726,11 @@ static int __init numa_emulation(unsigned long start_pfn,
 
 	if (num_nodes < 0)
 		return num_nodes;
-	memnode_shift = compute_hash_shift(nodes, num_nodes, NULL);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(nodeid); i++)
+		nodeid[i] = i;
+
+	memnode_shift = compute_hash_shift(nodes, num_nodes, nodeid);
 	if (memnode_shift < 0) {
 		memnode_shift = 0;
 		printk(KERN_ERR "No NUMA hash function found.  NUMA emulation "
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/