linux-kernel - [PATCH 30/33] x86-64, NUMA: Wrap node ID during emulation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:21:04 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, yinghai@...nel.org,
	brgerst@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com, shaohui.zheng@...el.com,
	rientjes@...gle.com, mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...ux.intel.com,
	ankita@...ibm.com
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 30/33] x86-64, NUMA: Wrap node ID during emulation

Both emulation layout functions - split_nodes[_size]_interleave() -
didn't wrap emulated nid while laying out the fake nodes and tried to
avoid interating over the specified number of nodes, which is fragile.

Now that the emulation code generates numa_meminfo, the node memblks
don't need to be consecutive and emulated node IDs can simply wrap.
This makes the code more robust and is necessary for updates to better
handle the cases where the physical nodes are interleaved.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@...el.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c |   12 ++----------
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index 30c087d..040d0ff 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -768,15 +768,7 @@ static int __init split_nodes_interleave(struct numa_meminfo *ei,
 			    memblock_x86_hole_size(end, physnodes[i].end) < size)
 				end = physnodes[i].end;
 
-			/*
-			 * Avoid allocating more nodes than requested, which can
-			 * happen as a result of rounding down each node's size
-			 * to FAKE_NODE_MIN_SIZE.
-			 */
-			if (nodes_weight(physnode_mask) + nid >= nr_nodes)
-				end = physnodes[i].end;
-
-			ret = emu_setup_memblk(ei, nid++, i,
+			ret = emu_setup_memblk(ei, nid++ % nr_nodes, i,
 					       physnodes[i].start,
 					       min(end, physnodes[i].end));
 			if (ret < 0)
@@ -873,7 +865,7 @@ static int __init split_nodes_size_interleave(struct numa_meminfo *ei,
 			    memblock_x86_hole_size(end, physnodes[i].end) < size)
 				end = physnodes[i].end;
 
-			ret = emu_setup_memblk(ei, nid++, i,
+			ret = emu_setup_memblk(ei, nid++ % MAX_NUMNODES, i,
 					       physnodes[i].start,
 					       min(end, physnodes[i].end));
 			if (ret < 0)
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/