linux-kernel - Re: Questions about Linux workqueue in 2.6.36

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:52:55 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Questions about Linux workqueue in 2.6.36

Hello,

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 09:57:21AM -0800, Ray Jui wrote:
> Regarding your second patch, which changes the initial mayday timeout to
> MAYDAY_INITIAL_TIMEOUT	= HZ / 100 >= 2 ? HZ / 100 : 2,
> 
> That's a minimum of 2 timer ticks, which is 20 ms in our
> system. Since the timer resolution in our system is 10 ms and it
> takes 15 ~ 20 ms to create a new kworker during kernel startup in
> our system, I verified that I need to change the minimum timer tick
> to 3 for the rescuer NOT to kick in our system during startup.

I think calling rescuers in that case is not perfect but okay.  It'll
only happen while the level of workers is below stable level.  It
would still be better to avoid calling in rescuers almost immediately
with 0 or 1 jiffy timeout.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/