linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.37 4/4] edac: i82975x driver revision change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:48:09 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To:	Arvind R <arvino55@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.37 4/4] edac: i82975x driver revision change

On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Arvind R wrote:

> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] edac: i82975x driver revision change
> 
> bump up revision to reflect 3 patches
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arvind R. <arvino55@...il.com>
> ---
>  i82975x_edac.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> ---
> diff -up a/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c b/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c
> --- a/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
>  #include <linux/edac.h>
>  #include "edac_core.h"
> 
> -#define I82975X_REVISION	" Ver: 1.0.0 " __DATE__
> +#define I82975X_REVISION	" Ver: 1.0.3 " __DATE__
>  #define EDAC_MOD_STR		"i82975x_edac"
> 
>  #define i82975x_printk(level, fmt, arg...) \

Does that really matter since we have git?

How about dropping that completely?

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/