linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:47:54 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

Hi Michal,

On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:02:00 +0100 Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> > _Maybe_ we could work around it by letting fixdep remove the actual
> > source file from the list of dependencies in the .cmd file. The
> > dependency on the .c / .S / whatever file is given by the Makefiles, the
> > .cmd file is only needed for additional dependencies on headers. Let's
> > see what else breaks then ;).
> 
> It seems to work for me. Can you try the patch below? It needs to be
> applied before merging 9599ec0 to have any effect.

Thanks, I will apply this as a fix on top of Linus' tree before I merge
anything else.  It looks simple enough that Linus may take it as a fix
right now.   Better to convince ourselves first, though, right?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped