linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Add extra gcc checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 20 Feb 2011 21:20:54 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
cc:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Add extra gcc checks

On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Borislav Petkov wrote:

> Add a 'W=1' Makefile switch which adds additional checking per build
> object.
> 
> The idea behind this option is targeted at developers who, in the
> process of writing their code, want to do the occasional
> 
> make W=1 [target.o]
> 
> and let gcc do more extensive code checking for them. Then, they
> could eyeball the output for valid gcc warnings about various
> bugs/discrepancies which are not reported during the normal build
> process.
> 

I like this. I often modify the Makefile to add something similar to this 
for my local builds. This will save me having to do that in the future.

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>            http://www.chaosbits.net/
Plain text mails only, please.
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/