linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86, numa: Do not scan two times for setup_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 19 Feb 2011 20:03:32 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86, numa: Do not scan two times for
 setup_node_bootmem()

On Fri, 18 Feb 2011, Yinghai Lu wrote:

> 
> We don't need to scan two times for setup_node_bootmem()
> because We are using mapped memblock for node_data finding already.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> 
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c |   31 +++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ static bool __init numa_meminfo_cover_me
>  
>  static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
>  {
> -	int i, j, nid;
> +	int i, nid;
>  
>  	/* Account for nodes with cpus and no memory */
>  	node_possible_map = numa_nodes_parsed;
> @@ -507,27 +507,22 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(
>  	init_memory_mapping_high();
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Finally register nodes.  Do it twice in case setup_node_bootmem
> -	 * missed one due to missing bootmem.
> +	 * Do not do that twice, not needed!
> +	 *   We are using mapped memblock directly for node data

I don't think this comment is actually needed, it seems to be referring to 
why this patch is changing it and has no real relevance once it's merged.

Other than that:

Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>

>  	 */
> -	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> -		for_each_node_mask(nid, node_possible_map) {
> -			u64 start = (u64)max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> -			u64 end = 0;
> +	for_each_node_mask(nid, node_possible_map) {
> +		u64 start = (u64)max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +		u64 end = 0;
>  
> -			if (node_online(nid))
> +		for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
> +			if (nid != mi->blk[i].nid)
>  				continue;
> -
> -			for (j = 0; j < mi->nr_blks; j++) {
> -				if (nid != mi->blk[j].nid)
> -					continue;
> -				start = min(mi->blk[j].start, start);
> -				end = max(mi->blk[j].end, end);
> -			}
> -
> -			if (start < end)
> -				setup_node_bootmem(nid, start, end);
> +			start = min(mi->blk[i].start, start);
> +			end = max(mi->blk[i].end, end);
>  		}
> +
> +		if (start < end)
> +			setup_node_bootmem(nid, start, end);
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/