linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] headers: fix circular dependency between linux/sched.h and linux/wait.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:18:18 +0200
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	balbi@...com, David Cohen <dacohen@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] headers: fix circular dependency between
 linux/sched.h and linux/wait.h

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 06:06:02PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 18:54 +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> 
> > What you seem to have missed is that sched.h doesn't include wait.h, it
> > includes completion.h and completion.h needs wait.h due the
> > wait_queue_head_t it uses.
> 
> Yeah, so? sched.h doesn't need completion.h, but like with wait.h I'd
> argue the other way around, completion.h would want to include sched.h

ok, now I get what you proposed. Still, we could have lived without the
sarcasm, but that's not subject to patching.

-- 
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/