| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:04:46 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Steven King <sfking00@...oo.com>, uClinux development list <uclinux-dev@...inux.org>, Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>, Greg Ungerer <gregungerer@...tnet.com.au> Subject: Re: merge of m68knommu and m68k arch branches? On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:40:53AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:29, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote: > >> >> Is there a plan to move m68k to the generic facilities as well ? > >> > >> Moving m68k to genirq is (the next thing?) on my list... > > > > If I succeed migrating sparc32 to genirq I hope to be of a little help here. > > It looks like a bigger task to migrate m68k than it was/is to migrate sparc32. > > > > It would be _very_ nice to get the last two architectures migrated to genirq. > > Aren't your forgetting s390? Hmm, I had the understanding that m68k and sparc32 was the only two remaining :-( But I did not check. s390 sees more active maintenance so if they become the last non genirq user, then they may feel a bit of pressure :-) Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists