lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:35:02 +0100
From:	"Schaefer Dr, Frank-Rene ()" <fschaef9@...teon.com>
To:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Interrupt Latencies

Hello. 

Having read "Moving interrupts to threads" at

           http://lwn.net/Articles/302043/

I expected to reduce interrupt latency during a SPI 
communication by handling the transmit-receive in a 
'quick_check_handler' using 

           request_threaded_irq(...);


However, the difference in latency to "request_irq(...)" 
is not measurable. It is still in the range from 60 to 110us
on a 1.6 GHz Atom CPU. From "linux/interrupt.h" I conclude 
that depending on 

           CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIQS

either 'request_irq' is mapped to 'request_threaded_irq' 
or vice versa. We are able to measure the latency precisely
as the difference of the time when the interrupt pin 'IN'
is raised and we raise our response pin 'OUT' as shown below.

      pin IN        .-------------------------
      ______________|
                    
      pin OUT                     .-----------
      ____________________________|
                          
                    |<- latency ->|

Could anyone point to locations in the kernel so that I can
precisely understand the mechanisms that cause the latency? It 
is totally incomprehensible to me why the 'quick_check_handler' 
must have a latency of 60us at min. (that are many thousand 
instructions).

Any help and comments are greatly appreciated.

Best Regards

Frank
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ