linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] cpuset: Fix unchecked calls to NODEMASK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:25:17 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, miaox@...fujitsu.com,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] cpuset: Fix unchecked calls to NODEMASK_ALLOC()

On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Li Zefan wrote:

> Unfortunately, as I looked into the code again I found cpuset_change_nodemask()
> is called by other functions that use the global cpuset_mems, so I
> think we'd better check the refcnt of cpuset_mems.
> 
> How about this:
> 
> [PATCH 3/4] cpuset: Fix unchecked calls to NODEMASK_ALLOC()
> 
> Those functions that use NODEMASK_ALLOC() can't propogate errno
> to users, so might fail silently.
> 
> Based on the fact that all of them are called with cgroup_mutex
> held, we fix this by using a global nodemask.
> 

If all of the functions that require a nodemask are protected by 
cgroup_mutex, then I think it would be much better to just statically 
allocate them within the function and avoid any nodemask in file scope.  
cpuset_mems cannot be shared so introducing it with a refcount would 
probably just be confusing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/