linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86-64, NUMA: Seperate out numa_alloc_distance() from numa_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:32:32 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64, NUMA: Seperate out numa_alloc_distance() from numa_set_distance()

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> Alloc code is much bigger the distance setting.  Separate it out into
>> numa_alloc_distance() for readability.
>
> FYI, the From: Yinghai line seems to be missing. If this patch is committed as-is
> then you will be the author.

Oh, don't worry.  It was committed with the proper --author option.  I
just forgot to retain the From header while posting the git generated
patch.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/