lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:38:15 +0530
From:	Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
To:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Cc:	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Can't build in the virtio console driver on x86_64 when the
 other virtio drivers are modular

On (Thu) 24 Feb 2011 [11:28:19], Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> The virtio configuration options are inconsistent. According to this,
> every options that needs virtio will select it:
> 
>  # Virtio always gets selected by whoever wants it.
>  config VIRTIO
>         tristate
> 
> Note that it's not user-selectable, so any config file that tries to
> set it will be ignored when kconfig loads those options. And yet we
> have a whole set of options that depend on VIRTIO, like VIRTIO_CONSOLE
> for example. This makes it impossible to have VIRTIO_PCI modular and
> VIRTIO_CONSOLE built-in on x86_64, because:

Any reason to have VIRTIO_PCI modular instead of built in (on x86-64,
virtio-console won't work without virtio-pci anyway)?

		Amit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ