linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/00]Remove one to many n's in a word.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:30:19 -0800
From:	Justin Mattock <justinmattock@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	John McCutchan <john@...nmccutchan.com>,
	Robert Love <rlove@...ve.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/00]Remove one to many n's in a word.


On Mar 1, 2011, at 6:12 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote:

> On Sat, 26 Feb 2011, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>> The Patch below removes one to many "n's" in a word..
>
> Hi Justin,
>
> I have applied all the patches from the series which were not  
> present in
> linux-next as of today (in a squashed-together form, no need to have
> separated commits for such cosmetic changes).
>
> I'd suggest that, unless any subsystem maintainer explicitly states
> otherwise, you submit all such similar changes justo to trivial@...nel.org
> (and perhaps CC LKML). I propose this because:
>
> - I believe most maintainers don't care about these changes and  
> don't need
>  to be bothered
> - it reduces annoying mail traffic (tens of mails because such
>  nano-change)
> - it reduces the trivial tree maintainership load, as I don't have  
> to wait
>  and cross-check which maintainer has applied which bits and which  
> ones
>  were not picked up
>
> -- 
> Jiri Kosina
> SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.


alright. makes sense.
I have another set of fixes that I did, I'll send it out later today  
or tomorrow to just trivial and lkml.

Justin P. Mattock
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/