linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Fix distance table handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 Mar 2011 11:53:25 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Fix distance table handling

On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 11:43:36AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > >From dcd414c795a28fff6e511d58e4cfd1202323c703 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> > Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 10:54:10 +0100
> 
> Btw., given that you basically took most of Yinghai's fixes, wouldnt it be better to 
> have this as a 'From: Yinghai' commit, with -v2 comments about minor updates you 
> did?

Yeah, this one was on the boundary for me.  I felt that I edited too
much of the original patch to leave Yinghai's From and S-O-B.  Please
don't take it wrong.  I wasn't trying to emphasize my editing but
wasn't sure whether the chain of custody can be maintained after such
edit.  Maybe I should just ask for respin, with which I haven't had a
lot of luck lately.  Eh well, I'll just change it this time.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/