linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2.6.38-rc5 2/2] block: blk-flush shouldn't call directly into q->request_fn() __blk_run

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 02 Mar 2011 08:46:46 -0500
From:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...il.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.6.38-rc5 2/2] block: blk-flush shouldn't call  directly
 into q->request_fn() __blk_run_queue()

On 2011-02-18 04:49, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:01:51AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> Hi Tejun,
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Jens, this is applicable to v2.6.37 and 38.  The new implementation
>>> for 39 would need similar fix but I couldn't find where the tree is.
>>> Which branch is it?
>>
>> for-2.6.39/core
> 
> Right, thanks.  Jens, after you apply the two fixes for 2.6.38, I can
> create a merge branch for for-2.6.39/core which you can pull.  Would
> that work for you?

Thanks, that would be great. I'm applying them now.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/