Now that we've removed the rq->lock requirement from the first part of
ttwu() and can compute placement without holding any rq->lock, ensure
we execute the second half of ttwu() on the actual cpu we want the
task to run on.

This avoids having to take rq->lock and doing the task enqueue
remotely, saving lots on cacheline transfers.

As measured using: http://oss.oracle.com/~mason/sembench.c

$ echo 4096 32000 64 128 > /proc/sys/kernel/sem
$ ./sembench -t 2048 -w 1900 -o 0

unpatched: run time 30 seconds 537953 worker burns per second
patched:   run time 30 seconds 847526 worker burns per second

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
---
 include/linux/sched.h   |    4 +--
 kernel/sched.c          |   56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/sched_features.h |    2 +
 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1202,6 +1201,7 @@ struct task_struct {
 	int lock_depth;		/* BKL lock depth */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	struct task_struct *wake_entry;
 	int on_cpu;
 #endif
 	int on_rq;
@@ -2185,7 +2185,7 @@ extern void set_task_comm(struct task_st
 extern char *get_task_comm(char *to, struct task_struct *tsk);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-static inline void scheduler_ipi(void) { }
+void scheduler_ipi(void);
 extern unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *, long match_state);
 #else
 static inline unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p,
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -557,6 +557,10 @@ struct rq {
 	unsigned int ttwu_count;
 	unsigned int ttwu_local;
 #endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	struct task_struct *wake_list;
+#endif
 };
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rq, runqueues);
@@ -2511,10 +2515,61 @@ static int ttwu_remote(struct task_struc
 	return ret;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+void sched_ttwu_pending(void)
+{
+	struct rq *rq = this_rq();
+	struct task_struct *list = xchg(&rq->wake_list, NULL);
+
+	if (!list)
+		return;
+
+	raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
+
+	while (list) {
+		struct task_struct *p = list;
+		list = list->wake_entry;
+		ttwu_do_activate(rq, p, 0);
+	}
+
+	raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
+}
+
+void scheduler_ipi(void)
+{
+	sched_ttwu_pending();
+}
+
+static void ttwu_queue_remote(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
+{
+	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+	struct task_struct *next = rq->wake_list;
+
+	for (;;) {
+		struct task_struct *old = next;
+
+		p->wake_entry = next;
+		next = cmpxchg(&rq->wake_list, old, p);
+		if (next == old)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	if (!next)
+		smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
+}
+#endif
+
 static void ttwu_queue(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
 {
 	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	if (!sched_feat(TTWU_FORCE_REMOTE) && cpu != smp_processor_id()) {
+		ttwu_queue_remote(p, cpu);
+		return;
+	}
+#endif
+
 	raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
 	ttwu_do_activate(rq, p, 0);
 	raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
@@ -6287,6 +6342,7 @@ migration_call(struct notifier_block *nf
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
 	case CPU_DYING:
+		sched_ttwu_pending();
 		/* Update our root-domain */
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
 		if (rq->rd) {
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_features.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_features.h
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_features.h
@@ -64,3 +64,5 @@ SCHED_FEAT(OWNER_SPIN, 1)
  * Decrement CPU power based on irq activity
  */
 SCHED_FEAT(NONIRQ_POWER, 1)
+
+SCHED_FEAT(TTWU_FORCE_REMOTE, 0)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/