lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:22:53 -0700
From:	"Nadolski, Edmund" <edmund.nadolski@...el.com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: RE: inconsistent lock state message on 2.6.36.4 stable release

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mel Gorman [mailto:mel@....ul.ie]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 2:04 PM
> To: Greg KH
> Cc: Nadolski, Edmund; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Williams, Dan J
> Subject: Re: inconsistent lock state message on 2.6.36.4 stable release
> 
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 03:25:15PM -0500, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 01:19:48PM -0700, Nadolski, Edmund wrote:
> > > With v2.6.36.4 stable release and CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING set, I
> notice
> > > the below message during boot (full dmesg attached):
> >
> > 2.6.36 is now "end of life" so there's really no need to test, debug,
> or
> > report problems here as there's nothing we can do about it.
> >
> > > Per git bisect, it seems to have originated with this commit:
> > >
> > > $ git bisect good
> > > c04eb9683fbb6374275309b859fcbf02e1db2c78 is the first bad commit
> > > commit c04eb9683fbb6374275309b859fcbf02e1db2c78
> > > Author: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
> > > Date:   Thu Jan 13 15:45:41 2011 -0800
> > >
> > >     mm: page allocator: adjust the per-cpu counter threshold when
> memory is low
> > >
> > >     commit 88f5acf88ae6a9778f6d25d0d5d7ec2d57764a97 upstream.
> > >
> > > The message goes away after I do a git revert on this commit. I've
> > > also seen this message on 2.6.37.2, but not on 2.6.38-rc7.
> >
> > Care to figure out what commit fixed this so that we can backport it
> to
> > the .37-stable kernel?
> >
> > git bisect can be used to do this as well.
> >
> 
> It looks like the call to get_online_cpus() that is causing the
> problem. If
> so, I believe it to be fixed by the commit [b44129b3: mm: vmstat: use a
> single setter function and callback for adjusting percpu thresholds].
> Edmund, care to test with that patch applied?

This patch looks good, I've applied it onto 2.6.37.2 and I no longer see the message.

Thanks!
Ed


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ