[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 18:07:56 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: David Ahern <daahern@...co.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
acme@...stprotocols.net, mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org,
paulus@...ba.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf script: change process_event prototype
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 07:11:38AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
>
>
> On 03/02/2011 07:40 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Seems the thread is needed by any endpoints. It would be better to resolve
> > it from process_sample_event and pass it to the process_event() handler.
>
> tracepoints yes; S/W samples no. If you want it I'll add it.
Hmm, yeah that looks more sensible, the majority of users seem to need it.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists