linux-kernel - Re: ANNOUNCE: debloat-testing kernel git tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:45:24 -0600
From:	Tianji Li <Tianji.Li@...m.ie>
To:	rick.jones2@...com
Cc:	Dave Täht <d@...t.net>, sedat.dilek@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	bloat-devel@...ts.bufferbloat.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: debloat-testing kernel git tree



On 03/03/2011 12:16 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
>> For wireless routers and cable home gateways especially, this research
>> shows that the total un-managed buffers in your system should be less
>> than 32.
>
> Would it be a good thing to start describing these queues not so much in
> terms of packets but in terms of delay (or bandwidth X delay)?
>

The unit of bandwidth is something like Mbps, that of delay can be 
second, so bandwidth X delay --> Mb, which is the unit of packet size. 
So both packets and delay should have the same effect for sizing buffers.

Tianji



> Constants tend to live longer than they should, no matter how noble in
> birth.
>
> rick jones
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat-devel mailing list
> Bloat-devel@...ts.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat-devel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/