lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 04 Mar 2011 16:55:36 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Paul Zimmerman <paulz@...opsys.com>,
	Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [31/73] xhci: Fix errors in the running total calculations in the TRB math

2.6.37-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Paul Zimmerman <Paul.Zimmerman@...opsys.com>

commit 5807795bd4dececdf553719cc02869e633395787 upstream.

Calculations like

	running_total = TRB_MAX_BUFF_SIZE -
		(sg_dma_address(sg) & (TRB_MAX_BUFF_SIZE - 1));
	if (running_total != 0)
		num_trbs++;

are incorrect, because running_total can never be zero, so the if()
expression will never be true. I think the intention was that
running_total be in the range of 0 to TRB_MAX_BUFF_SIZE-1, not 1
to TRB_MAX_BUFF_SIZE. So adding a

	running_total &= TRB_MAX_BUFF_SIZE - 1;

fixes the problem.

This patch should be queued for stable kernels back to 2.6.31.

Signed-off-by: Paul Zimmerman <paulz@...opsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
@@ -2375,6 +2375,7 @@ static unsigned int count_sg_trbs_needed
 		/* Scatter gather list entries may cross 64KB boundaries */
 		running_total = TRB_MAX_BUFF_SIZE -
 			(sg_dma_address(sg) & (TRB_MAX_BUFF_SIZE - 1));
+		running_total &= TRB_MAX_BUFF_SIZE - 1;
 		if (running_total != 0)
 			num_trbs++;
 
@@ -2661,6 +2662,7 @@ int xhci_queue_bulk_tx(struct xhci_hcd *
 	/* How much data is (potentially) left before the 64KB boundary? */
 	running_total = TRB_MAX_BUFF_SIZE -
 		(urb->transfer_dma & (TRB_MAX_BUFF_SIZE - 1));
+	running_total &= TRB_MAX_BUFF_SIZE - 1;
 
 	/* If there's some data on this 64KB chunk, or we have to send a
 	 * zero-length transfer, we need at least one TRB
@@ -2877,6 +2879,7 @@ static int count_isoc_trbs_needed(struct
 	td_len = urb->iso_frame_desc[i].length;
 
 	running_total = TRB_MAX_BUFF_SIZE - (addr & (TRB_MAX_BUFF_SIZE - 1));
+	running_total &= TRB_MAX_BUFF_SIZE - 1;
 	if (running_total != 0)
 		num_trbs++;
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ