linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Mar 2011 11:41:23 +0100
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree

Still merge conflicts with last commit [1].

- Sedat -

[1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-2.6-block.git;a=commit;h=b873c5d692d4d5453cceed18bb06c62bb1a73ac0

$ git log -1 | cat
commit c45165cd2c77843f24ca18af54044303dc2a81ab
Author: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon Mar 7 17:38:41 2011 +1100

    Add linux-next specific files for 20110307

    Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>

$ git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-2.6-block.git
for-next
remote: Counting objects: 158, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (89/89), done.
remote: Total 106 (delta 87), reused 21 (delta 17)
Receiving objects: 100% (106/106), 23.33 KiB, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (87/87), completed with 34 local objects.
>From git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-2.6-block
 * branch            for-next   -> FETCH_HEAD
warning: too many files (created: 1120 deleted: 637), skipping inexact
rename detection
warning: too many files (created: 974 deleted: 462), skipping inexact
rename detection
Auto-merging block/blk-core.c
Auto-merging block/blk-flush.c
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in block/blk-flush.c
Auto-merging block/cfq-iosched.c
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in block/cfq-iosched.c
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.



On 3/7/11, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> On 2011-03-07 07:36, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Hello, Stephen, Jens.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 01:19:58PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in
>>> block/blk-flush.c between commit 255bb490c8c27eed484d538efe6ef6a7473bd3f6
>>> ("block: blk-flush shouldn't call directly into q->request_fn()
>>> __blk_run_queue()") from the  tree and commit
>>> ae1b1539622fb46e51b4d13b3f9e5f4c713f86ae ("block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA
>>> to support merge") from the block tree.
>>>
>>> The latter rewrote a large part of the file, so I just used that.  If
>>> this is not correct, please fix it up in the block tree.
>>
>> I sent Jens a merge commit which should fix this yesterday.
>>
>>  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1101766/focus=1108915
>>
>> So, the merge problem should go away soonish.
>
> Merged now, so this conflict should be gone from linux-next as of now.
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/