lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:05:41 +0900
From:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Loop condition question. (GCC bug?)

I was trying to figure out what happens to "for (i = 0; i < n i++)" loop when
"i is int" and "sizeof(i) == 4" and "n is unsigned long" and "sizeof(n) == 8"
and "n is larger than INT_MAX" (in order to determine whether such comparison
can cause "int i" to become negative value).

----- Start of source code -----
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>

static int __init test_init(void)
{
	int i;
	unsigned long n = 2147483649UL;
	for (i = 2147483646; i < n; i++) {
		printk(KERN_INFO "*** i=%d\n", i);
		if (signal_pending(current))
			break;
	}
	return -EINVAL;
}

module_init(test_init);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
----- End of source code -----

# gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.5.1 20100924 (Red Hat 4.5.1-4)
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

# uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Feb 7 07:06:44 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

I got a strange behavior around the boundary.
Above program prints

*** i=2147483647
*** i=2147483647
*** i=2147483647
*** i=2147483647

line forever.

If the loop is "for (i = 2147483645; i < n; i++)" instead of
"for (i = 2147483646; i < n; i++)", it prints only

*** i=2147483645
*** i=2147483646
*** i=2147483647

lines.

If I use "volatile int i;" instead of "int i;", the
"for (i = 2147483646; i < n; i++)" loop prints only

*** i=2147483646
*** i=2147483647

lines.

Is this a compiler bug?

Also, is the "for (i = 0; i < n; i++)" loop guaranteed to stop at
i == 2147483647 if n is larger than 2147483648?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ