lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:29:31 +0100
From:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
CC:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...nel.org, Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>,
	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: fix mis-synchronisation in blkdev_issue_zeroout()

On 2011-03-11 09:06, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> BZ29402
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29402
> 
> We can hit serious mis-synchronization in bio completion path of
> blkdev_issue_zeroout() leading to a panic.
> 
> The problem is that when we are going to wait_for_completion() in
> blkdev_issue_zeroout() we check if the bb.done equals issued (number of
> submitted bios). If it does, we can skip the wait_for_completition()
> and just out of the function since there is nothing to wait for.
> However, there is a ordering problem because bio_batch_end_io() is
> calling atomic_inc(&bb->done) before complete(), hence it might seem to
> blkdev_issue_zeroout() that all bios has been completed and exit. At
> this point when bio_batch_end_io() is going to call complete(bb->wait),
> bb and wait does not longer exist since it was allocated on stack in
> blkdev_issue_zeroout() ==> panic!
> 
> (thread 1)                      (thread 2)
> bio_batch_end_io()              blkdev_issue_zeroout()
>   if(bb) {                      ...
>     if (bb->end_io)             ...
>       bb->end_io(bio, err);     ...
>     atomic_inc(&bb->done);      ...
>     ...                         while (issued != atomic_read(&bb.done))
>     ...                         (let issued == bb.done)
>     ...                         (do the rest of the function)
>     ...                         return ret;
>     complete(bb->wait);
>     ^^^^^^^^
>     panic
> 
> We can fix this easily by simplifying bio_batch and completion counting.
> 
> Also remove bio_end_io_t *end_io since it is not used.

Thanks Lukas, I'll expedite this for 2.6.38!

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ