linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] Check for write permission on FD based posix-clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 12 Mar 2011 18:35:34 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
cc:	Torben Hohn <torbenh@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	richard.cochran@...cron.at, johnstul@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Check for write permission on FD based
 posix-clocks

On Sat, 12 Mar 2011, Richard Cochran wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 08:46:57PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > As Arnd already said -EACCES is sensible for file permission checks
> > while -EPERM means that you have no permission at all.
> 
> Okay, so you will accept Torben's patch as is, into timers/core?

If there are no further objections, I'll pick it up.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/