lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:36:38 +0300
From:	Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
To:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
CC:	"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	"neilb@...e.de" <neilb@...e.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"bfields@...ldses.org" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	"skinsbursky@...nvz.org" <skinsbursky@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RPC: return task->tk_status from rpc_wait_for_completion_task()
 in case of successfull task completion

15.03.2011 17:26, Trond Myklebust пишет:
> On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 17:20 +0300, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>> Some NFS and NLM routines doesn't check RPC task tk_status if
>> rpc_wait_for_completion_task() returned 0 but have to.
>
> Examples please. I'm not aware of any such cases.
>
> Cheers
>     Trond
>

You are right. I was confused with different logic for NSFv4, NLM and NFSv3.
Drop the patch.
Sorry.

-- 
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ