lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 04:46:11 -0400
From:	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To:	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x32-abi@...glegroups.com
Subject: X32 syscall number base

in looking at how syscalls are implemented, i see that you've picked a base of 
4096.  so syscall numbers [0...4096) are for x86_64 and [4096...-1) are for 
x32.  this 4096 limit is a bit low isnt it ?  seems like the best bet would be 
to bisect the available space for each new ABI ...

ARM EABI picked 0x900000 for their base when adding a new ABI ...
-mike

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ