lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:48:41 +0100
From:	Michael Karcher <kernel@...rcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh@...all.nl>,
	Karsten Keil <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>
Subject: Re: known vboxgetty/isdn issue in 2.6.35.3?

Am Dienstag, den 09.11.2010, 11:15 +0100 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> On Saturday 06 November 2010, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> > ==> /proc/16758/stack <==
> > [<c118731a>] tty_unthrottle+0x13/0x3a
> > [<c1185f4e>] reset_buffer_flags+0xd4/0xd9
> > [<c1185f60>] n_tty_flush_buffer+0xd/0x63
> > [<c11888a7>] tty_ldisc_flush+0x1f/0x34
> > [<c120797c>] isdn_tty_modem_result+0x342/0x37c
> > [<c1209c5e>] isdn_tty_modem_hup+0x76/0x176
> > [<c120a66b>] isdn_tty_change_speed+0xa2/0xd4
> > [<c120a6da>] isdn_tty_set_termios+0x3d/0x5a
> > [<c118789b>] set_termios+0x318/0x397
> > [<c1187b41>] tty_mode_ioctl+0x178/0x2db
> > [<c1187de8>] n_tty_ioctl_helper+0x144/0x154
> > [<c11854d9>] n_tty_ioctl+0x97/0xa0
> > [<c1183ccd>] tty_ioctl+0x699/0x6d3
> > [<c108557c>] vfs_ioctl+0x27/0x91
> > [<c1085ade>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x44b/0x47f
> > [<c1085b53>] sys_ioctl+0x41/0x61
> > [<c10027d3>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x2d
> > [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
> 
> Ok, so it seems that set_termios calls change_termios, which holds the
> termios_mutex while calling isdn_tty_set_termios. This ends up
> calling tty_unthrottle, which tries to take the same mutex, and that fails.
[...]
> Please apply the patch below to see if it helps. We should probably
> have it in 2.6.32-stable and 2.6.35-stable, if there is another one.

The same issue happened on our system. Sometimes vboxgetty gets stuck in
state D on a debian stable system (2.6.32). I just applied your patch to
that kernel and hope the problem went away. Please remind me to report
back in one to two weeks if I didn't already report whether the hangs
are fixed. Is something except for a test on a productive system missing
to get this fix into 32-stable?

Regards,
  Michael Karcher

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ