linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.38: XFS/USB/HW issue, or failing USB stick?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:19:05 -0500
From:	Tim Soderstrom <tim@...cowproductions.org>
To:	Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
Cc:	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Piszcz <ap@...arrain.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.38: XFS/USB/HW issue, or failing USB stick?


On Mar 18, 2011, at 10:08 AM, Justin Piszcz wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I can write to just about the entire USB stick, with no errors:
> 
> atom:~# df -h
> Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda2             5.8G  1.5G  4.3G  26% /
> tmpfs                 2.0G     0  2.0G   0% /lib/init/rw
> udev                   10M  140K  9.9M   2% /dev
> tmpfs                 2.0G     0  2.0G   0% /dev/shm
> atom:~# cd /
> atom:/# ls
> bin   cdrom  etc   lib    media  nfs  proc  sbin     srv  tmp  var
> boot  dev    home  lib64  mnt    opt  root  selinux  sys  usr
> atom:/# dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=1M count=4000
> 4000+0 records in
> 4000+0 records out
> 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 135.536 s, 30.9 MB/s
> atom:/# df -h
> Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda2             5.8G  5.4G  350M  95% /
> tmpfs                 2.0G     0  2.0G   0% /lib/init/rw
> udev                   10M  140K  9.9M   2% /dev
> tmpfs                 2.0G     0  2.0G   0% /dev/shm
> atom:/# rm bigfile
> 
> However, after some amount of time, the errors occur below, is this USB
> stick failing?  Since it has no SMART, is there any other way to verify
> the 'health' of a USB stick?

What prompted you to go with XFS over, say, ext2? The journal will generally cause quite a bit more writes onto your USB device. I use ext2 on my CF card in my NAS for that reason (the spinning media is on XFS of course). I know that's not an answer to your problem but thought I would add it as a suggestion :)

Tim

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/