linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] perf: fix common misspellings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:39:37 -0300
From:	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, trivial@...nel.org,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	jason.wessel@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] perf: fix common misspellings

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi> wrote:
>
>>  2530 files changed, 4988 insertions(+), 4988 deletions(-)
>
> Hm, i definitely think we do not want hundreds of commits per cycle to have a
> 'split up' patchset for these spelling fixes.
>
> A once per cycle patch to fix such things would be the most optimal model IMHO
> - and hopefully with time the patches will be getting (much) smaller :-)


I don't think a patchset per cycle is needed. Or at least some cycles
could be skipped.

Maybe this check could be added to checkpatch.


Lucas De Marchi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/