linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH]Clean up CodingStyle for scripts/kconfig/gconf.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:32:30 +0100
From:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
To:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	zippel@...ux-m68k.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, greg@...ah.com, joe@...ches.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Clean up CodingStyle for scripts/kconfig/gconf.c

On 23.3.2011 02:28, Li Zefan wrote:
> Harry Wei wrote:
>> Hi us,
>>    	Clean up CodingStyle for scripts/kconfig/gconf.c.
>>
> 
> What makes you think this is a bad style? Does Documentation/CodingStyle say
> so? Does checkpatch.pl make a complain? Do you really think this improves
> readability? I don't think so, and actually it makes the code worse.

This include can be removed completely, there is no config.h in kconfig.

Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/