linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] usbnet: use eth%d name for known ethernet devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:13:54 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc:	Steve Calfee <stevecalfee@...il.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mnazarewicz@...il.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
	Linux USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	andy.green@...aro.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	roger.quadros@...ia.com,
	Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] usbnet: use eth%d name for known ethernet devices

On Thursday 24 March 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 16:38 -0700, Steve Calfee wrote:
> > On 03/23/11 16:17, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> > >>> On Wednesday 23 March 2011 20:53:13 Michał Nazarewicz wrote:
> > >>>> I think P2P could be better.
> > >>
> > >> OTOH, I knew that PTP was point-to-point.
> > >
> > > It can be any of that, depending on context.  For me PTP is more like
> > > Picture Transport Protocol, whereas "2" between two letters is usually
> > > "to".
> > >
> > Well, my 2 cents, picture transport protocol is so obviously different 
> > than flags for network interfaces it does not cause a mental collision. 
> 
> PTP is also Precision Time Protocol, which *is* used on network
> interfaces (maybe not USB-connected interfaces though).
> 
> How about FLAG_NON_IEEE, meaning that the physical layer is not based on
> an IEEE 802.3, 802.11 or other standard physical layer.

I think that doesn't really express the meaning, since FLAG_WWAN is
presumably also not IEEE, right?

Thanks for the bike shedding everyone, I'll just use my own color then
and call it FLAG_POINTTOPOINT.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/