linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Power management Kconfig modification for 2.6.39

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:39:33 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@...ubc.ca>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Power management Kconfig modification for 2.6.39

On Thursday, March 31, 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > That, in fact, is not necessary.  Moreover, it turns out that the patch size
> > is not much different, because only a few subsystems use CONFIG_HIBERNATION
> > directly.
> >
> > The patch below has only been slightly tested, in particular I'd like the Xen
> > people to check if it works for them.
> 
> Ok, this seems to make much more sense. Just from a quick scan, the
> places where you changed things to
> 
>   #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATE_CALLBACKS
> 
> really do seem to be about the freeze/thaw callbacks. So now the patch
> looks more logical to me. And it obviously doesn't change the
> user-visible questions.
> 
> Thank you,

Thanks for the review!

@Shriram: Can you please test if the new patch works with your other Xen
patches?

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/