linux-kernel - Re: excessive kworker activity when idle. (was Re: vma corruption in today's -git)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:58:50 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: excessive kworker activity when idle. (was Re: vma corruption in
 today's -git)

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:32:11PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
 > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
 > >
 > > I tried that, and wasn't particularly enlightened.
 > >
 > > +      6.53%  kworker/1:2  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] read_hpet
 > > +      4.83%  kworker/0:0  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] read_hpet
 > 
 > Go into those, deeper into the callchain. That's how to see what the
 > upper-level problem is - by seeing who actually calls it. The leafs
 > themselves (where the time is obviously spent) don't tend to be very
 > informative, no.
 
ok, a bit more interesting ?

-     17.67%  kworker/0:1  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] read_hpet
   - read_hpet                          
      - 76.07% timekeeping_get_ns        
         - ktime_get                      
            - 64.02% tick_dev_program_event
                 tick_program_event        
                 hrtimer_interrupt          
                 smp_apic_timer_interrupt    
               + apic_timer_interrupt         
            - 35.30% sched_clock_tick          
                 scheduler_tick                 
                 update_process_times            
                 tick_sched_timer                 
                 __run_hrtimer                     
                 hrtimer_interrupt                  
                 smp_apic_timer_interrupt            
               - apic_timer_interrupt                 
                  + 65.70% _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore 
                  + 27.33% _raw_spin_unlock_irq  
                  + 1.16% lock_acquire            
                  + 1.16% put_ldisc                
                  + 1.16% process_one_work          
                  + 1.16% lock_release               
                  + 0.78% worker_thread               
                  + 0.58% _raw_spin_lock_irqsave       
            + 0.55% tick_sched_timer      
      - 23.82% do_timer                    
           tick_do_update_jiffies64         
           tick_sched_timer                  
           __run_hrtimer                      
           hrtimer_interrupt                   
           smp_apic_timer_interrupt             
         - apic_timer_interrupt                  
            + 63.46% _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore  
            + 22.98% _raw_spin_unlock_irq      
            + 3.50% put_ldisc                   
            + 3.28% lock_acquire                 



btw, I left this on overnight capturing the output of /proc/loadavg
it didn't drop off at all, and this morning the laptop is almost too
hot to hold.

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/