linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] memblock: add error return when CONFIG_HAVE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:17:05 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] memblock: add error return when CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
 is not set

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
>
>>
>> setup_log_buf will pass function pointer, So this one is not needed,
>> right?
>
> The other function would need the #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK before calling
> memblock_alloc which I thought was the point of this patch?  Note we still
> have the last fallback of using alloc_boot_mem in kernel/init.c.

before that patch, it already use bootmem allocation.

So should be ok to drop this one.

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/