linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/4 v2] intel-iommu: don't cache iova above 32bit caching boundary

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 1 Apr 2011 17:32:53 -0700
From:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>, Mike Habeck <habeck@....com>
Cc:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4 v2] intel-iommu: don't cache iova above 32bit caching
 boundary

Mike Travis and Mike Habeck reported an issue where iova allocation
would return a range that was larger than a device's dma mask.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/29/423

The dmar initialization code will reserve all PCI MMIO regions and copy
those reservations into a domain specific iova tree.  It is possible for
one of those regions to be above the dma mask of a device.  It is typical
to allocate iovas with a 32bit mask (despite device's dma mask possibly
being larger) and cache the result until it exhausts the lower 32bit
address space.  Freeing the iova range that is >= the last iova in the
lower 32bit range when there is still an iova above the 32bit range will
corrupt the cached iova by pointing it to a region that is above 32bit.
If that region is also larger than the device's dma mask, a subsequent
allocation will return an unusable iova and cause dma failure.

Simply don't cache an iova that is above the 32bit caching boundary.

Reported-by: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Reported-by: Mike Habeck <habeck@....com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: stable@...nel.org 
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
---
Mike or Mike, can you try this?  I was able to reproduce the failure
in a few different ways and successfully test this patch against those
failures, but w/out real hw.

 drivers/pci/iova.c |   12 ++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/iova.c b/drivers/pci/iova.c
index 7914951..1690ca4 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/iova.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/iova.c
@@ -63,8 +63,16 @@ __cached_rbnode_delete_update(struct iova_domain *iovad, struct iova *free)
 	curr = iovad->cached32_node;
 	cached_iova = container_of(curr, struct iova, node);

-	if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo)
-		iovad->cached32_node = rb_next(&free->node);
+	if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo) {
+		struct rb_node *node = rb_next(&free->node);
+		struct iova *iova = container_of(node, struct iova, node);
+
+		/* only cache if it's below 32bit pfn */
+		if (iova->pfn_lo < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn)
+			iovad->cached32_node = node;
+		else
+			iovad->cached32_node = NULL;
+	}
 }

 /* Computes the padding size required, to make the
-- 
1.7.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/