linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][POKE] Skip looking for ioapic overrides when ioapics are not present

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:48:52 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	sedat.dilek@...il.com, Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kurup_avinash@...oo.com,
	maciej.rutecki@...il.com, rjw@...k.pl, zersaa@...il.com,
	stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][POKE] Skip looking for ioapic overrides when ioapics are not present

Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> writes:

> * Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't have a clue why my patch got lost, [...]
>
> It was not lost, it broke the build. You were notified but never followed up 
> with a working patch:
>
>   https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/2/91
>
> and a different patch was applied to get rid of the warning messages. We can 
> apply your patch (and that patch can undo the other fix), but it has to build, 
> obviously.

Ingo any clue why I this message didn't make it to me directly but I
only received it through the linux-kernel?

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/