[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 08:45:58 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paulo Marques <pmarques@...popie.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kbuild: move KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS from Kconfig to Makefile
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:40:51 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy said:
> 3. By default KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS is disabled and if kallsyms has issues,
> "make" should print a warning and suggest using KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS
If the Makefile has enough information to print the warning, why can't it go
ahead and do the extra pass itself instead of issuing the warning?
(I'm obviously missing something here, as I'm foolishly posting to lkml before
caffeine ;)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists