[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 19:31:49 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...sjkoch.de>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, john.williams@...alogix.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uio/pdrv_genirq: Add OF support
Hi Hans,
> > If the generic driver is not sufficent for a user and he
> > patches it, he can simply patch the version string, too?
>
> Or better write a dedicated driver. Patching a generic thing like uio_pdrv_genirq
> can only be done in specialized drivers in a project. That's hackery that won't
> make it into mainline anyway.
I exactly meant that, maybe didn't make it clear enough. Of course, a seperate
driver would be better, but guess what will happen in most projects.
> > Or can we use the notifiers to set up an individual version? That could also be
> > the place to do special board-setup connected to the selected version.
>
> How could that look like? If you have an idea for a generic solution, you're
> welcome.
That was more a brainstorming question; there are notifiers which help
populating function-pointers which also can't be expressed in a device-tree.
I just wanted to make sure this approach doesn't get overlooked.
So, the solution for now is to simply add a default value and we can check
later if it can be modified at runtime?
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists